Perguntas com a marcação «z-statistic»

55
Teste de Wald para regressão logística

Tanto quanto eu entendo, o teste de Wald no contexto da regressão logística é usado para determinar se uma determinada variável preditora é significativa ou não. Rejeita a hipótese nula do coeficiente correspondente sendo zero.XXX O teste consiste em dividir o valor do coeficiente pelo erro padrão...

logistic z-statistic
20
Quais são os valores corretos para precisão e rechamada em casos extremos?

Precisão é definida como: p = true positives / (true positives + false positives) É verdade que, como true positivese false positivesabordagem 0, a precisão se aproxima de 1? Mesma pergunta para recall: r = true positives / (true positives + false negatives) No momento, estou implementando...

precision-recall data-visualization logarithm references r networks data-visualization standard-deviation probability binomial negative-binomial r categorical-data aggregation plyr survival python regression r t-test bayesian logistic data-transformation confidence-interval t-test interpretation distributions data-visualization pca genetics r finance maximum probability standard-deviation probability r information-theory references computational-statistics computing references engineering-statistics t-test hypothesis-testing independence definition r censoring negative-binomial poisson-distribution variance mixed-model correlation intraclass-correlation aggregation interpretation effect-size hypothesis-testing goodness-of-fit normality-assumption small-sample distributions regression normality-assumption t-test anova confidence-interval z-statistic finance hypothesis-testing mean model-selection information-geometry bayesian frequentist terminology type-i-and-ii-errors cross-validation smoothing splines data-transformation normality-assumption variance-stabilizing r spss stata python correlation logistic logit link-function regression predictor pca factor-analysis r bayesian maximum-likelihood mcmc conditional-probability statistical-significance chi-squared proportion estimation error shrinkage application steins-phenomenon
10
Por que Anova () e drop1 () forneceram respostas diferentes para os GLMMs?

Eu tenho um GLMM do formulário: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Quando uso drop1(model, test="Chi"), obtenho resultados diferentes dos que utilizo Anova(model, type="III")na embalagem do carro ou summary(model). Estes dois...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion